Support this community by becoming a Sponsor
  
 LGS FEATURES
  MESSAGE BOARDS
  NEWSROOM
  SHARKS SCHEDULE
  SHARKS ROSTER
  DEPTH CHARTS
  INJURY REPORT
  SHARKIVES
  HOSER of the WEEK
  TICKET EXCHANGE
  LINKS
  HOME
 SITE INFORMATION
  Contact Us
  Meet the Staff
  Join the Team
  Advertise
  Our Sponsors




Dolla Dolla Bills Y'all!
Making it rain, NHL style
7/27/15 - By Ryan Hall -

Earlier this week the official deadline for expansion team bids passed, and now we know that there are only two new markets currently seeking entry into the National Hockey League: Las Vegas and Quebec City. Both of them seem to be a lock, with the only real question being 'when do they get in?' If you judge it solely by traction, then the logical step would be to have them both join in time for the 2016-2017 season, as the process of building their respective front offices, naming the team, releasing uniforms, etc. would definitely keep fans interested. If that is the league's plan, hopefully they announce it soon as putting together a franchise isn't something that can be done overnight.

While there are many intriguing angles to be considered when considering expansion, this past round of bids brings one large question to the forefront of my mind: why wasn't there more interest? Surely there aren't only 2 centers in the entire continent interested in joining the NHL; especially after Seattle and Markham (Ontario) were both linked to rumours about a franchise in the last 2 years. That doesn't even take into account Kansas City, Houston, and the diehards in Hartford that have been campaigning for the return of the Whalers from the moment they left in 1997.

So then, why only 2 bids?

The obvious answer lies in the amount of money that Commissioner Gary Bettman hinted would be needed to join the league - namely upwards of $500 million. That's a large chunk of change, and we know for a fact that it was the deciding factor in keeping Markham/Toronto 2 out of the process as between the cost of the franchise and building an arena the price tag would become nearly 1 billion dollars.

Let that sink in for a moment.

One billion dollars to join the NHL. A league that isn't even on ESPN, frequently is low on the Sportscenter highlight loop, and rarely receives front page print coverage.

It would be easy to say Bettman and NHL brass are the ones to blame, but let's not forget that they are only charging what they think they can get. There has to be someone with a business degree looking at this and deciding that $500 million is a reasonable price for an expansion team - so it's not a case of ignorance. For these same reasons I don't think this is a case of hubris either, as you can accuse Gary Bettman of many things, but being a cocky fool isn't one of them.

So what does that leave us with?

The only thing left is that this was a deliberate ploy by the league.

By valuing expansion clubs so highly it gives the impression that established clubs are worth considerably more; even when it is clear that isn't the case. This adds value to current owners, and makes it harder for any of them to sell their clubs as the asking price will be correspondingly higher than what they might actually be worth (see Arizona). I'm also firmly convinced that the $500 million price was decided upon after careful conversations with both Quebecor and Bill Foley (Las Vegas) to maximize the amount of money these groups would be willing to pay. After all, why not take as much as they are willing to give? The upshot of this is that 1 billion dollars will be split among the existing teams, which will make the owners exceedingly happy; and perhaps help prop up some cash strapped clubs (see Arizona).

The unfortunate part in all of this is that by chasing the money the NHL might be creating problems for itself in the future. While no one knows how strong a franchise will be in Quebec City or Las Vegas, what we do know is that there are other markets that are thirsting for the game. The sad truth is that for those centers it appears they can't afford to join the club, as the membership fees might outweigh the potential benefits. However, there is a back path, and that is by poaching an existing club that is suffering from financial hardships, with owners who are looking to cash out while they still can. (See Arizona and Carolina).

By leaving these potential suitors behind, the NHL has reduced their respective options, meaning that they will be less likely to play nice as they know they won't ever get in the front door. If the league thought that Jim Balsille was a headache, I wonder what kind of trauma 3 or 4 such individuals could inflict? Desperate people do desperate things, and the lure of professional hockey isn't going to vanish in these locales anytime soon.

In this way, maybe the NHL should realize it isn't all about the money.

Contact Ryan at at ryanhall@letsgosharks.com




SHARE THIS STORY:



What did you think of this article? Post your comments on the Feeder Forums

 
Holiday Gifts at BustedTees

Privacy Statement   |   Contact Us   |   Advertise
Copyright 1997-2015 LetsGoSharks.com. All rights reserved.
This website is an unofficial and independently operated source of news
and information not affiliated with the San Jose Sharks, any team, or league.